Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is a great alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it as often as you want and never have to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s great for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, that was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. For this reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose weight can easily do so when they only need to take with you the small product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have already been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert that allows you to put it into the mouth area, which means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also offers an extinguisher it is also in violation of regulations. The reason being that while there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke another one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming that they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. Along with sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers Vape have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco into the marketplace.
As well as the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially reduce the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not supply them with nicotine.
It seems that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning labels on the products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem just like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which in turn means that fewer people will purchase them.